BETH vs. ^GSPC
BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past year, BETH returned -46.96% vs 20.07% for ^GSPC. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BETH vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -31.24% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.41% return.
BETH
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- -27.29%
- YTD
- -31.24%
- 1Y
- -46.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.40%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | $37.98T | $37.61T | $41.48T |
| $25.58K | $35.12K | $73.06K |
BETH vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF | -31.24% | -11.20% | 85.03% | 39.34% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.41% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 11.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETH and ^GSPC is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETH vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
BETH
^GSPC
BETH vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETH | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.25 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 2.00 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 8.49 | -9.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETH vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -57.12%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETH | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.12% | -56.78% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.12% | -9.10% | -48.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.54% | -1.58% | -51.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -10.70% | -8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.38% | 2.14% | +35.24% |
Volatility
BETH vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that BETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETH | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.61% | 3.51% | +6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.71% | 10.11% | +25.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.67% | 12.87% | +34.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.63% | 17.01% | +33.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.63% | 18.07% | +32.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETH and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BETH has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETH dropped -57.12% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETH and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer