PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BETH vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and ^GSPC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

BETH vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
32.01%
6.72%
BETH
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BETH:

0.79

^GSPC:

1.62

Sortino Ratio

BETH:

1.46

^GSPC:

2.20

Omega Ratio

BETH:

1.17

^GSPC:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

BETH:

1.33

^GSPC:

2.46

Martin Ratio

BETH:

2.78

^GSPC:

10.01

Ulcer Index

BETH:

16.18%

^GSPC:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

BETH:

56.62%

^GSPC:

12.88%

Max Drawdown

BETH:

-33.89%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

BETH:

-16.98%

^GSPC:

-2.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -3.69% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 2.24% return.


BETH

YTD

-3.69%

1M

-10.52%

6M

32.01%

1Y

47.51%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

2.24%

1M

-1.73%

6M

6.72%

1Y

18.16%

5Y*

13.31%

10Y*

11.05%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BETH vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BETH is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BETH is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BETH is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BETH is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BETH is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BETH is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BETH vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BETH, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.791.62
The chart of Sortino ratio for BETH, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.462.20
The chart of Omega ratio for BETH, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.171.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for BETH, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.332.46
The chart of Martin ratio for BETH, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.7810.01
BETH
^GSPC

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16
0.79
1.62
BETH
^GSPC

Drawdowns

BETH vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-16.98%
-2.13%
BETH
^GSPC

Volatility

BETH vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) has a higher volatility of 10.74% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.43%. This indicates that BETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.74%
3.43%
BETH
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab