PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIN vs. FEDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIN vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than FEDM's 6.03% return.


BBIN

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.28%
YTD
8.64%
6M
10.96%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*

FEDM

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.29%
YTD
6.03%
6M
8.22%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIN vs. FEDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
8.64%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%0.65%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
6.03%26.85%2.85%17.39%-15.25%1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIN and FEDM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.96

The correlation between BBIN and FEDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBIN vs. FEDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBIN
FEDM

Financial Services

24.8%
27.1%

Industrials

16.6%
17.8%

Technology

12.5%
10.9%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
5.7%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.6%

Energy

3.0%
5.7%

Utilities

1.7%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.8%

Financial Services

BBIN
24.8%
FEDM
27.1%

Industrials

BBIN
16.6%
FEDM
17.8%

Technology

BBIN
12.5%
FEDM
10.9%

Healthcare

BBIN
9.0%
FEDM
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

BBIN
5.9%
FEDM
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BBIN
5.4%
FEDM
5.7%

Basic Materials

BBIN
5.0%
FEDM
5.9%

Communication Services

BBIN
3.2%
FEDM
4.6%

Energy

BBIN
3.0%
FEDM
5.7%

Utilities

BBIN
1.7%
FEDM
3.5%

Real Estate

BBIN
0.3%
FEDM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIN vs. FEDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIN vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBINFEDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.02

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.54

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.38

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.96

4.97

+1.99

BBIN vs. FEDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the FEDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIN and FEDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBINFEDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.02

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.46

+0.08

Drawdowns

BBIN vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIN drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than FEDM's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIN and FEDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBINFEDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-29.37%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-11.92%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-14.24%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-2.01%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-6.99%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.30%

-0.19%

Volatility

BBIN vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) at 4.78%. This indicates that BBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBINFEDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

4.78%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

12.44%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

16.14%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

16.46%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

16.46%

+2.66%

BBIN vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIN has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBIN vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison

BBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than FEDM's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.63%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.82%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIN and FEDM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBIN has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to FEDM (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIN dropped -33.37% vs FEDM's -29.37%.

On 3-year performance, BBIN leads with 16.72% vs 13.99% for FEDM. On fees, BBIN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FEDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBIN has performed better with a 16.72% return vs 13.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FEDM.

BBIN has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 2.82% for FEDM.

BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index, while FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBIN and 0.12% for FEDM.

BBIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIN and FEDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer