PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIN vs. HDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIN vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBIN having a 11.84% return and HDEF slightly higher at 11.93%.


BBIN

1D
0.40%
1M
1.26%
6M
5.47%
YTD
11.84%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.38%

HDEF

1D
-0.35%
1M
3.34%
6M
7.69%
YTD
11.93%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
9.03%
ALL TIME*
8.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.58M$13.94M$10.75M
$3.48M$3.76M$5.72M

BBIN vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
11.84%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%11.74%7.91%3.13%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
11.93%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIN and HDEF is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019

0.89

The correlation between BBIN and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBIN vs. HDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBIN
HDEF

Financial Services

25.1%
27.2%

Industrials

19.2%
7.6%

Technology

12.9%
0.6%

Healthcare

10.4%
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
20.0%

Basic Materials

5.8%
0.6%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.7%

Utilities

3.6%
8.1%

Energy

3.5%
10.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.8%

Financial Services

BBIN
25.1%
HDEF
27.2%

Industrials

BBIN
19.2%
HDEF
7.6%

Technology

BBIN
12.9%
HDEF
0.6%

Healthcare

BBIN
10.4%
HDEF
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BBIN
7.4%
HDEF
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

BBIN
6.8%
HDEF
20.0%

Basic Materials

BBIN
5.8%
HDEF
0.6%

Communication Services

BBIN
3.8%
HDEF
3.7%

Utilities

BBIN
3.6%
HDEF
8.1%

Energy

BBIN
3.5%
HDEF
10.4%

Real Estate

BBIN
1.6%
HDEF
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIN vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBIN vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBINHDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.90

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.28

8.29

-0.01

BBIN vs. HDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the HDEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIN and HDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBIN vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIN drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum HDEF drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIN and HDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBINHDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-36.43%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-8.03%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-11.15%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-23.63%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.30%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-5.02%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.80%

+0.29%

Volatility

BBIN vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 2.63%. This indicates that BBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBINHDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

2.63%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

9.46%

+4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

11.63%

+4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

14.15%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

16.14%

+2.93%

BBIN vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIN has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBIN vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison

BBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than HDEF's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.61%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.71%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIN and HDEF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBIN has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to HDEF (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIN dropped -33.37% vs HDEF's -36.43%.

On 5-year performance, HDEF leads with 11.74% vs 9.27% for BBIN. On fees, BBIN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HDEF has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HDEF.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 3.61% for BBIN.

BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index, while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBIN and 0.20% for HDEF.

HDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIN and HDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer