PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIN vs. EFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIN vs. EFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIN achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than EFAX's 7.53% return.


BBIN

1D
0.57%
1M
2.54%
YTD
9.35%
6M
12.30%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*

EFAX

1D
0.62%
1M
3.31%
YTD
7.53%
6M
10.68%
1Y
18.91%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIN vs. EFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
9.35%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%11.74%7.91%3.14%
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
7.53%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIN and EFAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2019

0.98

The correlation between BBIN and EFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBIN vs. EFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBIN
EFAX

Financial Services

24.8%
18.6%

Industrials

16.6%
9.5%

Technology

12.5%
11.6%

Healthcare

9.0%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
6.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.2%

Energy

3.0%
1.5%

Utilities

1.7%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.6%

Financial Services

BBIN
24.8%
EFAX
18.6%

Industrials

BBIN
16.6%
EFAX
9.5%

Technology

BBIN
12.5%
EFAX
11.6%

Healthcare

BBIN
9.0%
EFAX
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

BBIN
5.9%
EFAX
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BBIN
5.4%
EFAX
6.1%

Basic Materials

BBIN
5.0%
EFAX
3.9%

Communication Services

BBIN
3.2%
EFAX
3.2%

Energy

BBIN
3.0%
EFAX
1.5%

Utilities

BBIN
1.7%
EFAX
1.2%

Real Estate

BBIN
0.3%
EFAX
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIN vs. EFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIN vs. EFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBINEFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.21

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

1.79

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.58

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.38

5.85

+1.52

BBIN vs. EFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the EFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIN and EFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBINEFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.21

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.47

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.53

+0.01

Drawdowns

BBIN vs. EFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIN drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, roughly equal to the maximum EFAX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIN and EFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBINEFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-32.53%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-12.38%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-13.52%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-31.67%

+2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-1.01%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-6.97%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.34%

-0.23%

Volatility

BBIN vs. EFAX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBINEFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.39%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

13.09%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

15.65%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

16.66%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

17.10%

+2.03%

BBIN vs. EFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIN has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBIN vs. EFAX - Dividend Comparison

BBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than EFAX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.61%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.19%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BBIN and EFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFAX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to BBIN (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIN dropped -33.37% vs EFAX's -32.53%.

On 5-year performance, BBIN leads with 8.84% vs 7.85% for EFAX. On fees, BBIN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBIN has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 7.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAX.

BBIN has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 3.19% for EFAX.

BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index, while EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBIN and 0.20% for EFAX.

BBIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIN and EFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer