BBIN vs. FNDF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).

BBIN and FNDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBIN is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2019. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both BBIN and FNDF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BBIN vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBIN vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBIN JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF	1.46%	31.86%	3.65%	18.54%	-14.29%	11.74%	7.91%	3.14%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	8.23%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	3.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIN achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 8.23% return.

BBIN

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -7.94%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 6.60%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -7.26%
• YTD: 8.23%
• 6M: 17.33%
• 1Y: 40.22%
• 3Y*: 20.38%
• 5Y*: 12.44%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIN vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIN has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

FNDF

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

BBIN

JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF

Return for Risk

BBIN vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIN

BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 75
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 74
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 95
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIN vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBIN	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.31	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.02	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.46	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	3.52	-1.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.52	13.78	-6.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBIN vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIN and FNDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBIN	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	2.31	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.78	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.49	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between BBIN and FNDF is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BBIN vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

BBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than FNDF's 3.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBIN JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF	3.89%	3.87%	3.41%	3.20%	2.83%	3.54%	1.07%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	3.18%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Drawdowns

BBIN vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIN drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIN and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBIN	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.37%	-40.14%	+6.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.57%	-11.08%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	-25.56%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.27%	-7.26%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.39%	-7.72%	+1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.83%	+0.17%

Volatility

BBIN vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 7.98% and 8.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBIN	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	8.06%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.32%	11.42%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.02%	17.50%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.39%	16.05%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	17.64%	+1.49%