BAP vs. ASTS
BAP (Credicorp Ltd.) and ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) are both stocks. BAP operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while ASTS operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 5 years, BAP returned 30.93%/yr vs 51.99%/yr for ASTS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAP vs. ASTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAP achieves a 34.85% return, which is significantly higher than ASTS's 13.47% return.
BAP
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 21.83%
- YTD
- 34.85%
- 6M
- 36.98%
- 1Y
- 77.15%
- 3Y*
- 45.10%
- 5Y*
- 30.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
ASTS
- 1D
- -15.53%
- 1M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 123.21%
- 3Y*
- 140.29%
- 5Y*
- 51.99%
- 10Y*
- —
BAP vs. ASTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 34.85% | 65.23% | 31.35% | 16.29% | 14.47% | -15.76% |
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 13.47% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -31.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAP and ASTS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between BAP and ASTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BAP:
$27.79B
ASTS:
$23.96B
BAP:
PEN 90.36
ASTS:
-$1.84
BAP:
0.97
ASTS:
257.48
BAP:
0.72
ASTS:
9.00
BAP:
PEN 28.76B
ASTS:
$84.94M
BAP:
PEN 22.06B
ASTS:
-$22.93M
BAP:
PEN 11.19B
ASTS:
-$536.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAP vs. ASTS — Risk / Return Rank
BAP
ASTS
BAP vs. ASTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAP | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.23 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 2.60 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 5.06 | +5.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAP vs. ASTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAP drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, smaller than the maximum ASTS drawdown of -85.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAP and ASTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAP | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.92% | -85.57% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -47.69% | +31.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.53% | -70.66% | +44.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.40% | -85.57% | +52.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -38.08% | +38.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -40.51% | +16.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.09% | 24.42% | -17.33% |
Volatility
BAP vs. ASTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is 15.39%, while AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a volatility of 41.20%. This indicates that BAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAP | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.39% | 41.20% | -25.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.90% | 85.03% | -56.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.59% | 105.98% | -73.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.63% | 109.52% | -77.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.20% | 111.00% | -79.80% |
Dividends
BAP vs. ASTS - Dividend Comparison
BAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 3.86% | 3.78% | 6.65% | 4.52% | 2.84% | 0.99% | 5.37% | 3.95% | 1.94% | 4.16% | 1.47% | 2.25% |
Financials
BAP vs. ASTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credicorp Ltd. and AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BAP and ASTS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (41.20%) compared to BAP (15.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAP dropped -75.92% vs ASTS's -85.57%.
BAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAP and ASTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer