ASTS vs. LUNR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR).

Performance

ASTS vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ASTS vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc.	14.10%	244.22%	249.92%	25.10%	-39.29%	-34.33%
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	14.36%	-10.63%	610.76%	-74.45%	3.73%	-0.10%

Fundamentals

EPS ASTS : -$1.33 LUNR : -$1.29
PS Ratio ASTS : 300.23 LUNR : 6.62
Total Revenue (TTM) ASTS : $70.92M LUNR : $210.06M
Gross Profit (TTM) ASTS : $37.89M LUNR : $26.05M
EBITDA (TTM) ASTS : -$330.80M LUNR : -$88.45M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ASTS having a 14.10% return and LUNR slightly higher at 14.36%.

ASTS

• 1D: 12.26%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 68.85%
• 1Y: 264.42%
• 3Y*: 153.62%
• 5Y*: 48.72%
• 10Y*: —

LUNR

• 1D: 13.52%
• 1M: 12.62%
• YTD: 14.36%
• 6M: 76.43%
• 1Y: 149.13%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ASTS vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASTS

ASTS Risk / Return Rank: 92
ASTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ASTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ASTS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ASTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ASTS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 84
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 80
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASTS vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASTS	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.46	+1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	2.36	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.28	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.20	3.10	+2.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	6.56	+5.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASTS vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASTS and LUNR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASTS	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	1.46	+1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.09	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between ASTS and LUNR is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ASTS vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASTS nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ASTS vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASTS drawdown since its inception was -91.07%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTS and LUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASTS	LUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.07%	-97.43%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.02%	-41.88%	-5.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.12%	-77.36%	+45.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.82%	-63.23%	+19.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.34%	19.83%	+0.51%

Volatility

ASTS vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) have volatilities of 31.61% and 33.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASTS	LUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.61%	33.24%	-1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.82%	83.21%	-2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.01%	102.91%	-2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	110.71%	172.98%	-62.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.08%	172.98%	-72.90%

Financials