ASTS vs. GSAT
ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) and GSAT (Globalstar, Inc.) are both stocks. ASTS operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while GSAT operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, ASTS returned 50.21%/yr vs 24.62%/yr for GSAT. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASTS vs. GSAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASTS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than GSAT's 30.75% return.
ASTS
- 1D
- -9.26%
- 1M
- -30.86%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- -15.37%
- 1Y
- 59.32%
- 3Y*
- 120.25%
- 5Y*
- 50.21%
- 10Y*
- —
GSAT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- 30.75%
- 6M
- 19.78%
- 1Y
- 239.91%
- 3Y*
- 76.29%
- 5Y*
- 24.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.97%
ASTS vs. GSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.77% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -31.73% |
GSAT Globalstar, Inc. | 30.75% | 96.59% | 6.70% | 45.86% | 14.66% | -10.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASTS and GSAT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.40 |
Fundamentals
ASTS:
$21.28B
GSAT:
$10.25B
ASTS:
-$1.84
GSAT:
-$0.11
ASTS:
228.68
GSAT:
35.97
ASTS:
8.00
GSAT:
29.90
ASTS:
$84.94M
GSAT:
$283.02M
ASTS:
-$22.93M
GSAT:
$95.43M
ASTS:
-$536.80M
GSAT:
$69.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASTS vs. GSAT — Risk / Return Rank
ASTS
GSAT
ASTS vs. GSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASTS | GSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.49 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 9.10 | -7.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | 22.24 | -19.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASTS vs. GSAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASTS drawdown since its inception was -85.57%, smaller than the maximum GSAT drawdown of -99.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTS and GSAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASTS | GSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.57% | -99.14% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.69% | -26.53% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.66% | -50.72% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.57% | -67.54% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.01% | -69.63% | +24.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.50% | -88.36% | +47.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.02% | 10.84% | +14.18% |
Volatility
ASTS vs. GSAT - Volatility Comparison
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a higher volatility of 42.16% compared to Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) at 4.61%. This indicates that ASTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASTS | GSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.16% | 4.61% | +37.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.93% | 41.16% | +42.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 106.17% | 69.78% | +36.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.65% | 77.67% | +31.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.98% | 89.82% | +21.16% |
Dividends
ASTS vs. GSAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor GSAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ASTS vs. GSAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AST SpaceMobile, Inc. and Globalstar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTS and GSAT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (42.16%) compared to GSAT (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASTS dropped -85.57% vs GSAT's -99.14%.
GSAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASTS and GSAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer