BABW vs. METV
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while METV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. BABW is actively managed, while METV is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for METV.
Performance
BABW vs. METV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -28.86% return, which is significantly lower than METV's 1.17% return.
BABW
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -39.00%
- YTD
- -28.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 8.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- —
BABW vs. METV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -28.86% | -16.98% |
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 1.17% | -6.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and METV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. METV — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
METV
BABW vs. METV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABW | METV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABW vs. METV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, smaller than the maximum METV drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and METV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | METV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.76% | -59.64% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -10.51% | -34.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.80% | -25.71% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.07% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. METV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | METV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.27% | 25.37% | +24.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 30.05% | +20.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 29.96% | +20.31% |
BABW vs. METV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than METV's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABW vs. METV - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.23%, more than METV's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 49.23% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and METV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METV is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METV is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 49.23%, compared with 0.18% for METV.
BABW is categorized as Derivative Income, while METV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.75% for METV.
Find the right allocation for BABW and METV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer