BABW vs. LQTI
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
BABW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -35.65% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.47% return.
BABW
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -23.91%
- YTD
- -35.65%
- 6M
- -37.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -35.65% | -16.98% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.47% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and LQTI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI
BABW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.11% | -3.41% | -46.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.11% | -1.13% | -48.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -0.90% | -22.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.53% | 5.11% | +43.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.53% | 5.94% | +42.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.53% | 5.94% | +42.59% |
BABW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.67%, more than LQTI's 9.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 51.67% | 10.68% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.08% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and LQTI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 51.67%, compared with 9.08% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for BABW and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer