BABW vs. BETZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. BABW is actively managed, while BETZ is passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.

Performance

BABW vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -17.38% return, which is significantly lower than BETZ's -10.38% return.

BABW

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: -5.34%
• YTD: -17.38%
• 6M: -24.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BETZ

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -1.15%
• YTD: -10.38%
• 6M: -8.91%
• 1Y: -6.17%
• 3Y*: 4.93%
• 5Y*: -8.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABW vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	-17.38%	-18.22%
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	-10.38%	-2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BABW and BETZ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.29

Return for Risk

BABW vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ

BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 6
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABW vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BABW	BETZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.97	0.13	-1.10

Drawdowns

BABW vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -40.29%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and BETZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABW	BETZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.29%	-60.82%	+20.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-60.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.94%	-39.37%	+3.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.10%	-33.81%	+11.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BABW	BETZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.61%	20.49%	+29.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.61%	26.94%	+22.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.61%	27.94%	+21.67%

BABW vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BABW vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.81%, more than BETZ's 5.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	37.81%	10.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	5.10%	4.57%	0.86%	0.00%	0.66%	0.00%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABW and BETZ in my portfolio?

BABW and BETZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BABW or BETZ?

On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABW or BETZ?

BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABW or BETZ?

BABW has the higher dividend yield at 37.81%, compared with 5.10% for BETZ.

What is the main difference between BABW and BETZ?

BABW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BETZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.75% for BETZ.