BABW vs. BETZ
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. BABW is actively managed, while BETZ is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.
Performance
BABW vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -28.86% return, which is significantly lower than BETZ's -7.53% return.
BABW
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -39.00%
- YTD
- -28.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETZ
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 1Y
- -15.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -5.90%
- 10Y*
- —
BABW vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -28.86% | -16.98% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -7.53% | -2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and BETZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BETZ
BABW vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABW | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABW vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and BETZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.76% | -60.82% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -37.44% | -7.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.80% | -33.86% | +8.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.31% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.27% | 20.75% | +29.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 26.98% | +23.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 27.88% | +22.39% |
BABW vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABW vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.23%, more than BETZ's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 49.23% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 4.95% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and BETZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 49.23%, compared with 4.95% for BETZ.
BABW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BETZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.75% for BETZ.
Find the right allocation for BABW and BETZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer