BABW vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

BABW vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -17.95% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 150.89% return.

BABW

• 1D: 4.66%
• 1M: 38.27%
• 6M: -30.25%
• YTD: -17.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMDW

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -8.62%
• 6M: 113.70%
• YTD: 150.89%
• 1Y: 214.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 231.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.29M	$9.36M	$8.60M
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	$94.03K	$69.08K	$57.32K

BABW vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	-17.95%	-16.98%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	150.89%	-10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BABW and AMDW is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

BABW vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BABW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 89
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BABW vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BABW	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.52	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.22	—

Drawdowns

BABW vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABW	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.76%	-34.64%	-20.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.38%	-20.07%	-16.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.97%	-13.99%	-12.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BABW	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	28.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	66.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.55%	85.77%	-35.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.55%	84.89%	-34.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.55%	84.89%	-34.34%

BABW vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BABW and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

BABW vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.50%, less than AMDW's 55.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	55.51%	34.78%
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	46.50%	10.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABW and AMDW in my portfolio?

BABW and AMDW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BABW or AMDW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABW or AMDW?

BABW and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABW or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 55.51%, compared with 46.50% for BABW.