BABW vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill Investments. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

BABW vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -35.65% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 297.09% return.

BABW

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -23.91%
• YTD: -35.65%
• 6M: -37.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -13.02%
• 1M: 22.00%
• YTD: 297.09%
• 6M: 286.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABW vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	-35.65%	-16.98%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	297.09%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BABW and ARMW is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

BABW vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

BABW vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABW	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.11%	-48.47%	-1.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.11%	-20.08%	-30.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-25.29%	+1.60%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BABW	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.53%	94.74%	-46.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.53%	94.74%	-46.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.53%	94.74%	-46.21%

BABW vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BABW and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

BABW vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.67%, more than ARMW's 25.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	25.98%	16.38%
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF	51.67%	10.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABW and ARMW in my portfolio?

BABW and ARMW have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BABW or ARMW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABW or ARMW?

BABW and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABW or ARMW?

BABW has the higher dividend yield at 51.67%, compared with 25.98% for ARMW.