ATMP vs. UMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI).
ATMP and UMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. UMI is an actively managed fund by Wainwright, Inc.. It was launched on Mar 24, 2021.
Performance
ATMP vs. UMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATMP vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 19.13% | 6.99% | 38.74% | 21.58% | 27.47% | 41.34% | -28.67% | 7.25% | -9.55% | 4.48% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 18.78% | 5.11% | 42.97% | 14.60% | 20.78% | 20.97% | -8.25% | 21.06% | -10.64% | 2.76% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ATMP having a 19.13% return and UMI slightly lower at 18.78%.
ATMP
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 19.13%
- 6M
- 21.03%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 28.36%
- 5Y*
- 26.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
UMI
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- 26.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.65%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATMP vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
UMI
ATMP vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATMP | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.99 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.31 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 4.13 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATMP | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.99 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.62 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and UMI is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ATMP vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison
ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than UMI's 6.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.58% | 5.14% | 4.72% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 5.89% | 8.71% | 6.86% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 6.30% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 6.07% | 6.23% | 4.39% | 4.67% | 4.36% | 3.00% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -73.72%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and UMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.72% | -48.08% | -25.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.11% | -14.76% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -20.05% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.92% | -3.39% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -6.67% | -10.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 4.47% | +1.34% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 4.10% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 9.89% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 17.84% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 20.47% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.57% | 23.29% | +4.28% |