ATMP vs. UMI
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc.. ATMP is passively managed, while UMI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ATMP returned 17.66%/yr vs 22.24%/yr for UMI. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UMI.
Performance
ATMP vs. UMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 24.32% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 26.85% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 22.91%
- YTD
- 24.32%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
UMI
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 27.68%
- YTD
- 26.85%
- 1Y
- 30.77%
- 3Y*
- 27.34%
- 5Y*
- 22.24%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 24.32% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | 8.81% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 26.85% | 5.11% | 42.97% | 14.60% | 20.78% | 20.97% | -8.25% | 21.06% | -10.64% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and UMI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ATMP and UMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
UMI
ATMP vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 4.12 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 10.38 | -3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and UMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -48.08% | -32.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -7.50% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -17.08% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -20.05% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -1.39% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -6.57% | -24.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 2.97% | +0.55% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) have volatilities of 5.32% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 5.40% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 11.38% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 14.61% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 19.47% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 23.14% | +4.49% |
ATMP vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATMP vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison
ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 5.79% | 6.23% | 4.39% | 4.67% | 4.36% | 3.00% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ATMP and UMI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UMI has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to ATMP (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs UMI's -48.08%.
On 5-year performance, UMI leads with 22.24% vs 17.66% for ATMP. On fees, UMI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UMI has performed better with a 22.24% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UMI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
ATMP is categorized as MLPs, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.85% for UMI.
UMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and UMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer