UMI vs. MLPA
Compare and contrast key facts about USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA).
UMI and MLPA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMI is an actively managed fund by Wainwright, Inc.. It was launched on Mar 24, 2021. MLPA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2012.
Performance
UMI vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMI vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 20.99% | 5.11% | 42.97% | 14.60% | 20.78% | 20.97% | -8.25% | 21.06% | -10.64% | 2.76% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 13.45% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 39.64% | -33.97% | 11.91% | -15.71% | 4.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMI achieves a 20.99% return, which is significantly higher than MLPA's 13.45% return.
UMI
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 20.99%
- 6M
- 19.71%
- 1Y
- 20.67%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 24.10%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPA
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMI vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UMI vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank
UMI
MLPA
UMI vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMI | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.59 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 0.86 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 0.63 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 1.56 | +3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMI | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.59 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | 1.02 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.16 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMI and MLPA is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UMI vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison
UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, less than MLPA's 7.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 5.96% | 6.23% | 4.39% | 4.67% | 4.36% | 3.00% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.15% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
Drawdowns
UMI vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMI drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI and MLPA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMI | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.08% | -78.75% | +30.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.76% | -14.20% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.05% | -18.75% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -2.87% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -20.50% | +13.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 5.73% | -1.27% |
Volatility
UMI vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) at 3.34%. This indicates that UMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMI | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 3.34% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 7.92% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 16.09% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 18.41% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 27.64% | -4.35% |