PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UMI vs. MLPA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


UMIMLPA
YTD Return42.46%17.06%
1Y Return46.43%16.77%
3Y Return (Ann)23.53%17.55%
5Y Return (Ann)17.66%10.81%
Sharpe Ratio3.761.45
Sortino Ratio5.142.10
Omega Ratio1.661.26
Calmar Ratio8.301.81
Martin Ratio30.207.41
Ulcer Index1.60%2.43%
Daily Std Dev12.84%12.35%
Max Drawdown-48.08%-78.74%
Current Drawdown-1.21%-1.03%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between UMI and MLPA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

UMI vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, UMI achieves a 42.46% return, which is significantly higher than MLPA's 17.06% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
23.72%
5.18%
UMI
MLPA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UMI vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.


UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
Expense ratio chart for UMI: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for MLPA: current value at 0.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.46%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UMI vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UMI, currently valued at 3.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UMI, currently valued at 5.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UMI, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.66
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UMI, currently valued at 8.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.008.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UMI, currently valued at 30.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0030.20
MLPA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MLPA, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MLPA, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MLPA, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MLPA, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.81
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MLPA, currently valued at 7.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.007.41

UMI vs. MLPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the MLPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMI and MLPA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.76
1.45
UMI
MLPA

Dividends

UMI vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than MLPA's 7.45% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
3.99%4.67%4.78%3.37%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.45%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.85%9.11%10.03%8.07%7.16%9.29%5.80%5.62%

Drawdowns

UMI vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMI drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI and MLPA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.21%
-1.03%
UMI
MLPA

Volatility

UMI vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) at 3.52%. This indicates that UMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.24%
3.52%
UMI
MLPA