PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UMI vs. MLPR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


UMIMLPR
YTD Return42.46%27.98%
1Y Return46.43%30.82%
3Y Return (Ann)23.53%32.01%
Sharpe Ratio3.761.56
Sortino Ratio5.142.16
Omega Ratio1.661.27
Calmar Ratio8.302.65
Martin Ratio30.208.09
Ulcer Index1.60%4.09%
Daily Std Dev12.84%21.17%
Max Drawdown-48.08%-48.98%
Current Drawdown-1.21%-1.73%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between UMI and MLPR is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

UMI vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, UMI achieves a 42.46% return, which is significantly higher than MLPR's 27.98% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
23.72%
7.35%
UMI
MLPR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UMI vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.


MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
Expense ratio chart for MLPR: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for UMI: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UMI vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UMI, currently valued at 3.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UMI, currently valued at 5.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UMI, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.66
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UMI, currently valued at 8.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.008.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UMI, currently valued at 30.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0030.20
MLPR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MLPR, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MLPR, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MLPR, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MLPR, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MLPR, currently valued at 8.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.09

UMI vs. MLPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the MLPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMI and MLPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.76
1.56
UMI
MLPR

Dividends

UMI vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than MLPR's 9.84% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
3.99%4.67%4.78%3.37%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
9.84%10.08%10.07%10.69%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UMI vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMI drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI and MLPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.21%
-1.73%
UMI
MLPR

Volatility

UMI vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) is 4.24%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that UMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.24%
8.33%
UMI
MLPR