ATMP vs. SDOG
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ATMP returned 5.20%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for SDOG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SDOG.
Performance
ATMP vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than SDOG's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ATMP has underperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 5.20%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
ATMP vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.13% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and SDOG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2013 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ATMP and SDOG has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
SDOG
ATMP vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.40 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 4.25 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | 13.63 | -7.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than SDOG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and SDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -43.56% | -37.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -6.24% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -16.00% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -19.84% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -43.56% | -32.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | 0.00% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -4.91% | -26.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.94% | +1.19% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) at 3.34%. This indicates that ATMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 3.34% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 8.02% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 11.52% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 15.44% | +6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 19.06% | +8.61% |
ATMP vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATMP vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison
ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.26% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and SDOG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATMP has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to SDOG (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs SDOG's -43.56%.
On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.99% vs 5.20% for ATMP. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
ATMP is categorized as MLPs, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.36% for SDOG.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and SDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer