ATMP vs. PAVE
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ATMP returned 15.87%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
ATMP vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ATMP having a 20.02% return and PAVE slightly lower at 19.88%.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 20.02%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.02% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -12.85% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and PAVE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ATMP and PAVE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
PAVE
ATMP vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATMP | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.99 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 2.82 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.13 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 11.50 | -5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATMP | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.99 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.81 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.68 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -44.08% | -36.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -11.91% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -26.23% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -26.23% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.07% | -1.82% | -4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.15% | -6.24% | -24.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.24% | -0.29% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.61%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 6.42% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 15.17% | -4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 18.84% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 21.60% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 24.38% | +3.30% |
ATMP vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATMP vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and PAVE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to ATMP (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs 15.87% for ATMP. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ATMP has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 15.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
ATMP is categorized as MLPs, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer