PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. VAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. VAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly higher than VAW's 13.44% return.


PAVE

1D
1.63%
1M
0.35%
YTD
19.04%
6M
19.47%
1Y
38.20%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.29%
10Y*

VAW

1D
1.34%
1M
1.17%
YTD
13.44%
6M
17.54%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
19.04%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%14.11%
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
13.44%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%17.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and VAW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.88

The correlation between PAVE and VAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAVE vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAVE
VAW

Industrials

74.8%
1.0%

Basic Materials

20.3%
90.2%

Utilities

3.2%

-

Technology

1.1%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
0.0%

Energy

0.2%
0.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.3%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

PAVE
74.8%
VAW
1.0%

Basic Materials

PAVE
20.3%
VAW
90.2%

Utilities

PAVE
3.2%
VAW

-

Technology

PAVE
1.1%
VAW
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

PAVE
0.3%
VAW
0.0%

Energy

PAVE
0.2%
VAW
0.5%

Communication Services

PAVE

-

VAW

-

Consumer Cyclical

PAVE

-

VAW
8.3%

Financial Services

PAVE

-

VAW

-

Healthcare

PAVE

-

VAW
0.5%

Real Estate

PAVE

-

VAW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAVEVAWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

1.39

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

1.98

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.86

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.84

6.13

+5.71

PAVE vs. VAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the VAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and VAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAVEVAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.39

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.30

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.39

+0.28

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum VAW drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and VAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEVAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-62.17%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-13.42%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-23.21%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-25.50%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-3.56%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-9.63%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

4.08%

-0.84%

Volatility

PAVE vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison

Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) have volatilities of 6.46% and 6.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVEVAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

6.32%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

13.93%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.84%

17.65%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.60%

19.62%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.39%

21.20%

+3.19%

PAVE vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVE vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than VAW's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.77%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%0.00%
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.36%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and VAW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAVE has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to VAW (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs VAW's -62.17%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.29% vs 5.91% for VAW. On fees, VAW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VAW has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.29% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VAW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.

VAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.

PAVE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VAW is Materials. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.10% for VAW.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and VAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer