PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 23.96% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 29.16% return.


PAVE

1D
1.16%
1M
7.83%
YTD
23.96%
6M
21.60%
1Y
42.46%
3Y*
26.32%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*

GRID

1D
1.46%
1M
2.61%
YTD
29.16%
6M
28.54%
1Y
50.38%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
18.03%
10Y*
20.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
23.96%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%13.41%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
29.16%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and GRID is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017

0.78

The correlation between PAVE and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAVE vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAVE
GRID

Industrials

75.9%
24.2%

Basic Materials

19.5%
0.0%

Utilities

3.1%
3.9%

Technology

1.0%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%

-

Energy

0.2%
1.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.3%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

PAVE
75.9%
GRID
24.2%

Basic Materials

PAVE
19.5%
GRID
0.0%

Utilities

PAVE
3.1%
GRID
3.9%

Technology

PAVE
1.0%
GRID
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

PAVE
0.2%
GRID

-

Energy

PAVE
0.2%
GRID
1.6%

Communication Services

PAVE

-

GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

PAVE

-

GRID
2.3%

Financial Services

PAVE

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

PAVE

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

PAVE

-

GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAVEGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

4.32

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

15.44

-2.41

PAVE vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-40.56%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-11.73%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-20.77%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-29.64%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.14%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-8.42%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.27%

0.00%

Volatility

PAVE vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 6.41%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVEGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

9.03%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.70%

17.61%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.50%

20.79%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.64%

21.27%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.39%

22.87%

+1.52%

PAVE vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVE vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than GRID's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.76%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.74%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and GRID have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to PAVE (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 19.28% vs 18.03% for GRID. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 19.28% return vs 18.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.74% for PAVE.

PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer