PAVE vs. IFRA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA).
PAVE and IFRA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAVE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. It was launched on Mar 6, 2017. IFRA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. Both PAVE and IFRA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PAVE or IFRA.
Performance
PAVE vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 30.32% return, which is significantly higher than IFRA's 27.99% return.
PAVE
30.32%
7.33%
15.86%
44.49%
21.88%
N/A
IFRA
27.99%
7.23%
17.45%
38.77%
15.36%
N/A
Key characteristics
| PAVE | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.39 | 2.48 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.30 | 3.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.43 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.21 | 5.49 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.09 | 13.44 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.43% | 2.95% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.82% | 15.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.08% | -41.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.45% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAVE vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IFRA's 0.40% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and IFRA is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PAVE vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PAVE vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than IFRA's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.53% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.60% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.07% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than IFRA's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and IFRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PAVE vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 6.06%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.