ASMH vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ASMH is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

ASMH vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASMH

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 19.55%
• YTD: 85.33%
• 6M: 88.06%
• 1Y: 160.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -7.59%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	22.24%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	31.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and ARMH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

ASMH vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 94

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASMH	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.20	—	—

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMH	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-24.85%	+8.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.59%	+7.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-7.21%	+3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMH	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.35%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.23%	117.89%	-76.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.72%	117.89%	-78.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.72%	117.89%	-78.17%

ASMH vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASMH and ARMH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ASMH vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.51%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMH and ARMH in my portfolio?

ASMH and ARMH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMH or ARMH?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMH or ARMH?

ASMH and ARMH have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMH or ARMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between ASMH and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Precidian Funds and Precidian.