ASMH vs. ARMH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Precidian. ASMH is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

ASMH vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASMH

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -8.15%
• 6M: 18.92%
• YTD: 56.41%
• 1Y: 140.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 105.08%

ARMH

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -23.97%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	$194.56K	$502.72K	$705.34K
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	$131.16K	$380.41K	$302.79K

ASMH vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	3.16%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	-22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and ARMH is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

ASMH vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASMH vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASMH	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.29	—	—

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -21.52%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -48.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMH	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.52%	-48.81%	+27.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.35%	-45.80%	+27.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-23.00%	+18.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMH	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.72%	99.09%	-55.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.65%	99.09%	-57.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.65%	99.09%	-57.44%

ASMH vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASMH and ARMH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ASMH vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.96%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMH and ARMH in my portfolio?

ASMH and ARMH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMH or ARMH?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMH or ARMH?

ASMH and ARMH have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMH or ARMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.