ARMH vs. CHAT
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
ARMH vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 27.78%
- YTD
- 74.30%
- 6M
- 73.13%
- 1Y
- 144.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and CHAT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
CHAT
ARMH vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMH | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 471,500.14 | 1.98 | +471,498.16 |
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -31.34% | +29.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.66% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -5.35% | +4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.00% | 30.74% | +82.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.00% | 29.90% | +83.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.00% | 29.90% | +83.10% |
ARMH vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.64% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and CHAT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.75% for CHAT.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer