ASMH vs. IETC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC).

ASMH and IETC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025. IETC is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Mar 21, 2018.

Performance

ASMH vs. IETC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ASMH vs. IETC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	25.77%	58.84%
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF	-12.93%	38.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 25.77% return, which is significantly higher than IETC's -12.93% return.

ASMH

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -6.47%
• YTD: 25.77%
• 6M: 39.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IETC

• 1D: 4.09%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: -12.93%
• 6M: -13.11%
• 1Y: 18.42%
• 3Y*: 23.99%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. IETC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IETC's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ASMH

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

IETC

iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF

Return for Risk

ASMH vs. IETC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IETC

IETC Risk / Return Rank: 39
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMH	IETC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.00	0.73	+2.27

Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and IETC is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ASMH vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than IETC's 0.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.29%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF	0.45%	0.38%	0.52%	0.79%	0.92%	0.73%	0.48%	0.95%	1.27%

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum IETC drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and IETC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMH	IETC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-38.48%	+22.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.21%	-17.97%	+6.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-8.20%	+3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMH	IETC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.81%	26.59%	+10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.81%	24.41%	+12.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.81%	25.43%	+11.38%