ASMH vs. FTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).
ASMH and FTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both ASMH and FTEC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ASMH vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASMH vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 25.77% | 58.84% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | -7.30% | 45.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 25.77% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's -7.30% return.
ASMH
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- YTD
- 25.77%
- 6M
- 39.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- -7.30%
- 6M
- -6.15%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.76%
- 10Y*
- 21.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASMH vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ASMH vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
ASMH
FTEC
ASMH vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.00 | 0.85 | +2.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMH and FTEC is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ASMH vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than FTEC's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 1.29% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
ASMH vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and FTEC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -34.95% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -12.65% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -5.61% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.22% | — |
Volatility
ASMH vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASMH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.81% | 27.51% | +9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.81% | 25.12% | +11.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.81% | 24.57% | +12.24% |