ASMH vs. IDGT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT).

ASMH and IDGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025. IDGT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 10, 2001. Both ASMH and IDGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ASMH vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ASMH vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	25.77%	58.84%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	15.26%	19.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 25.77% return, which is significantly higher than IDGT's 15.26% return.

ASMH

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -6.47%
• YTD: 25.77%
• 6M: 39.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IDGT

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 15.26%
• 6M: 13.47%
• 1Y: 33.94%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.

IDGT

iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF

ASMH

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

ASMH vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDGT

IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 85
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMH	IDGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.00	0.14	+2.85

Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and IDGT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ASMH vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than IDGT's 0.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.29%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	0.97%	1.17%	1.64%	0.37%	0.30%	0.28%	0.60%	0.42%	0.65%	0.57%	0.75%	0.72%

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and IDGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMH	IDGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-77.95%	+62.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.21%	-2.55%	-8.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-20.05%	+15.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMH	IDGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.81%	21.55%	+15.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.81%	23.03%	+13.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.81%	23.14%	+13.67%