ARMH vs. HACK
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while HACK is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.
Performance
ARMH vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HACK
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 24.54%
- YTD
- 27.17%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.84%
ARMH vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and HACK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
HACK
ARMH vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMH | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 471,500.14 | 0.57 | +471,499.57 |
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and HACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -42.68% | +41.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.00% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -11.63% | +11.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.58% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.00% | 25.47% | +87.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.00% | 24.18% | +88.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.00% | 23.27% | +89.73% |
ARMH vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and HACK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.
HACK has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.60% for HACK.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and HACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer