PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMH vs. HACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMH vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HACK

1D
-3.00%
1M
24.54%
YTD
27.17%
6M
21.31%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
27.72%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
15.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and HACK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMH vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMH

HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMH vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMHHACKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

471,500.14

0.57

+471,499.57

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and HACK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMHHACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-42.68%

+41.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.00%

+3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-11.63%

+11.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.58%

Volatility

ARMH vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMHHACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.00%

25.47%

+87.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.00%

24.18%

+88.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.00%

23.27%

+89.73%

ARMH vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARMH vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARMH and HACK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

HACK has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.60% for HACK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMH and HACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer