ARMH vs. MAGS
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
ARMH vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -7.59%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -2.94%
- 6M
- -3.75%
- 1Y
- 22.89%
- 3Y*
- 29.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 31.98% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and MAGS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAGS
ARMH vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -29.91% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.59% | -9.75% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -4.74% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.61% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.89% | 20.73% | +97.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.89% | 26.02% | +91.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.89% | 26.02% | +91.87% |
ARMH vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.52% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and MAGS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.29% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer