ASMH vs. XLKI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ASMH is passively managed, while XLKI is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.

Performance

ASMH vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 85.33% return, which is significantly higher than XLKI's 16.82% return.

ASMH

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 19.55%
• YTD: 85.33%
• 6M: 88.06%
• 1Y: 160.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLKI

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 16.82%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	85.33%	47.51%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	16.82%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and XLKI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

ASMH vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 94

XLKI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASMH	XLKI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.20	—	—

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and XLKI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMH	XLKI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-10.24%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.54%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-1.75%	-2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMH	XLKI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.35%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.23%	18.25%	+22.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.72%	18.25%	+21.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.72%	18.25%	+21.47%

ASMH vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMH vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than XLKI's 14.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.51%	0.19%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	14.32%	8.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMH and XLKI in my portfolio?

ASMH and XLKI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMH or XLKI?

On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMH or XLKI?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLKI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMH or XLKI?

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 1.51% for ASMH.

What is the main difference between ASMH and XLKI?

They also come from different issuers: Precidian Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ASMH and 0.35% for XLKI.