PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ARMH vs. DAPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ARMH vs. DAPP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while DAPP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DAPP.

Performance

ARMH vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

DAPP

1D
-2.57%
1M
10.45%
YTD
33.03%
6M
15.86%
1Y
55.85%
3Y*
57.26%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF		23.00%
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF		-3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and DAPP is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF

Often compared with ARMH:
ARMH vs. SOXXARMH vs. AISARMH vs. VGTARMH vs. MAGSARMH vs. XLKIARMH vs. XLKARMH vs. BOTZ
Often compared with DAPP:
DAPP vs. BLOKDAPP vs. BKCHDAPP vs. FDIGDAPP vs. BITQDAPP vs. WGMIDAPP vs. DAPP.LDAPP vs. CRPT

Return for Risk

ARMH vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ARMH
DAPP
DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMH vs. DAPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ARMHDAPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.91

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

-0.00

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

471,500.14

-0.07

+471,500.22

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. DAPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum DAPP drawdown of -91.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and DAPP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ARMHDAPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-91.90%

+90.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-48.21%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-58.88%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-91.90%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-27.06%

+27.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-57.42%

+57.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

24.56%

—

Volatility

ARMH vs. DAPP - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ARMHDAPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

15.49%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

46.31%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.00%

61.71%

+51.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.00%

72.90%

+40.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.00%

72.64%

+40.36%

ARMH vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DAPP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMH vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARMH nor DAPP has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF		0.00%0.00%4.04%0.00%0.00%10.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

ARMH and DAPP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DAPP.

ARMH and DAPP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.50% for DAPP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMH and DAPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer