PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMH vs. FEPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMH vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 63.99% return, which is significantly higher than FEPI's 10.42% return.


ASMH

1D
1.53%
1M
25.24%
YTD
63.99%
6M
53.18%
1Y
130.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEPI

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.91%
YTD
10.42%
6M
11.37%
1Y
33.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and FEPI is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

0.52

The correlation between ASMH and FEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMH vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMH
ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FEPI
FEPI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASMHFEPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.24

2.58

+5.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.26

8.66

+12.60

ASMH vs. FEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMH Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the FEPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMH and FEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMHFEPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36

2.02

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.59

1.16

+2.43

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum FEPI drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and FEPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMHFEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-23.56%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-12.91%

-2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.45%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-3.51%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

3.84%

+2.30%

Volatility

ASMH vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a higher volatility of 13.84% compared to REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) at 3.31%. This indicates that ASMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMHFEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.84%

3.31%

+10.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.43%

12.58%

+17.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.94%

16.54%

+22.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.32%

19.02%

+19.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.32%

19.02%

+19.30%

ASMH vs. FEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FEPI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMH vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than FEPI's 23.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF
0.99%0.19%0.00%0.00%
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
23.92%25.48%27.18%4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASMH and FEPI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMH has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to FEPI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMH dropped -15.89% vs FEPI's -23.56%.

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 130.11% vs 33.15% for FEPI. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 130.11% return vs 33.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FEPI.

FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 23.92%, compared with 0.99% for ASMH.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian Funds and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ASMH and 0.65% for FEPI.

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMH and FEPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer