ARMH vs. BOTZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ).

ARMH and BOTZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016.

Performance

ARMH vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARMH vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	39.97%	-2.01%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	-8.31%	29.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMH achieves a 39.97% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -8.31% return.

ARMH

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: 20.77%
• YTD: 39.97%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: -14.86%
• YTD: -8.31%
• 6M: -5.83%
• 1Y: 17.52%
• 3Y*: 9.59%
• 5Y*: -0.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

ARMH vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARMH	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.36	+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and BOTZ is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ARMH vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

ARMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than BOTZ's 0.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.42%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.71%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -42.04%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMH	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.04%	-55.54%	+13.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.75%	-16.24%	+2.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.33%	-18.56%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMH	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.59%	27.77%	+22.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.59%	26.53%	+24.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.59%	25.68%	+24.91%