PortfoliosLab logo
ARMK vs. NOC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ARMK and NOC is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ARMK vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aramark (ARMK) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ARMK:

1.03

NOC:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

ARMK:

1.51

NOC:

0.38

Omega Ratio

ARMK:

1.19

NOC:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

ARMK:

0.98

NOC:

0.20

Martin Ratio

ARMK:

2.74

NOC:

0.47

Ulcer Index

ARMK:

9.86%

NOC:

8.63%

Daily Std Dev

ARMK:

29.85%

NOC:

25.50%

Max Drawdown

ARMK:

-72.26%

NOC:

-69.38%

Current Drawdown

ARMK:

-4.09%

NOC:

-11.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARMK:

$10.51B

NOC:

$68.43B

EPS

ARMK:

$1.32

NOC:

$25.33

PE Ratio

ARMK:

30.38

NOC:

18.77

PEG Ratio

ARMK:

1.57

NOC:

3.08

PS Ratio

ARMK:

0.60

NOC:

1.70

PB Ratio

ARMK:

3.44

NOC:

4.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARMK:

$17.62B

NOC:

$40.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARMK:

$1.38B

NOC:

$7.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARMK:

$1.25B

NOC:

$5.70B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMK achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly higher than NOC's 2.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ARMK has underperformed NOC with an annualized return of 7.19%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.


ARMK

YTD

8.25%

1M

21.87%

6M

-0.68%

1Y

30.34%

3Y*

18.71%

5Y*

17.97%

10Y*

7.19%

NOC

YTD

2.61%

1M

-0.56%

6M

-1.13%

1Y

8.76%

3Y*

2.10%

5Y*

9.12%

10Y*

13.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Aramark

Northrop Grumman Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARMK vs. NOC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARMK is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARMK is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARMK is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARMK is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARMK is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARMK is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NOC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOC is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOC is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOC is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOC is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOC is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOC is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ARMK vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ARMK Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMK and NOC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ARMK vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than NOC's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ARMK
Aramark
1.02%1.05%1.19%1.06%1.19%1.14%1.01%1.47%0.97%1.09%1.09%1.00%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.29%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%1.84%

Drawdowns

ARMK vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMK drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, roughly equal to the maximum NOC drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMK and NOC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ARMK vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

Aramark (ARMK) has a higher volatility of 10.53% compared to Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) at 5.50%. This indicates that ARMK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ARMK vs. NOC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aramark and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
4.28B
9.47B
(ARMK) Total Revenue
(NOC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARMK vs. NOC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aramark and Northrop Grumman Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
8.4%
16.7%
(ARMK) Gross Margin
(NOC) Gross Margin
ARMK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported a gross profit of 359.65M and revenue of 4.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.4%.

NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.58B and revenue of 9.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

ARMK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported an operating income of 174.18M and revenue of 4.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 573.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

ARMK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported a net income of 61.85M and revenue of 4.28B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 481.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.