PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMK vs. DY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARMK vs. DY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aramark (ARMK) and Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMK achieves a 47.73% return, which is significantly higher than DY's 43.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ARMK has underperformed DY with an annualized return of 9.77%, while DY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.21% annualized return.


ARMK

1D
-0.42%
1M
20.77%
YTD
47.73%
6M
47.44%
1Y
36.39%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
9.77%

DY

1D
-1.60%
1M
12.08%
YTD
43.82%
6M
37.16%
1Y
112.57%
3Y*
65.96%
5Y*
43.98%
10Y*
19.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMK vs. DY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARMK
Aramark
47.73%-0.08%34.28%-4.71%13.54%-3.04%-10.01%51.69%-31.47%20.96%
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
43.82%94.13%51.24%22.96%-0.17%24.15%60.17%-12.75%-51.50%38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMK and DY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.36

The correlation between ARMK and DY shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARMK:

$14.43B

DY:

$14.76B

EPS

ARMK:

$1.34

DY:

$10.52

PE Ratio

ARMK:

40.46

DY:

46.18

PEG Ratio

ARMK:

1.11

DY:

0.65

PS Ratio

ARMK:

0.74

DY:

2.30

PB Ratio

ARMK:

4.40

DY:

7.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARMK:

$19.41B

DY:

$6.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARMK:

$1.25B

DY:

$1.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARMK:

$1.33B

DY:

$1.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMK vs. DY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMK
ARMK Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ARMK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMK Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DY
DY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMK vs. DY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARMKDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

2.50

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

3.49

-1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

4.56

-2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.65

15.70

-12.05

ARMK vs. DY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARMK Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the DY Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMK and DY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMKDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.50

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.02

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.36

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.25

+0.08

Drawdowns

ARMK vs. DY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMK drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum DY drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMK and DY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMKDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.27%

-93.54%

+21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.15%

-24.43%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.63%

-32.58%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

-33.70%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.27%

-89.01%

+16.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-9.20%

+8.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-45.67%

+32.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.67%

7.10%

+2.57%

Volatility

ARMK vs. DY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aramark (ARMK) is 10.98%, while Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) has a volatility of 27.11%. This indicates that ARMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMKDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.98%

27.11%

-16.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

38.02%

-18.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.94%

45.30%

-19.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.02%

43.50%

-14.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.75%

52.93%

-16.18%

Dividends

ARMK vs. DY - Dividend Comparison

ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while DY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARMK
Aramark
0.86%1.18%1.05%1.19%1.06%1.19%1.14%1.01%1.47%0.97%1.09%1.10%
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARMK vs. DY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aramark and Dycom Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.91B
1.96B
(ARMK) Total Revenue
(DY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARMK vs. DY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aramark and Dycom Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
6.0%
14.0%
Portfolio components
ARMK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported a gross profit of 294.23M and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.

DY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.

ARMK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported an operating income of 219.75M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

DY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

ARMK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported a net income of 101.95M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

DY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARMK and DY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DY has higher volatility (27.11%) compared to ARMK (10.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMK dropped -72.27% vs DY's -93.54%.

DY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMK and DY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer