ARMK vs. CTAS
ARMK (Aramark) and CTAS (Cintas Corporation) are both stocks. ARMK operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while CTAS operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ARMK returned 9.65%/yr vs 23.39%/yr for CTAS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARMK vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMK achieves a 46.04% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's -6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ARMK has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 9.65%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.39% annualized return.
ARMK
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 19.84%
- YTD
- 46.04%
- 6M
- 43.62%
- 1Y
- 33.92%
- 3Y*
- 24.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
CTAS
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- -6.63%
- 6M
- -4.93%
- 1Y
- -22.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.76%
- 10Y*
- 23.39%
ARMK vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | 46.04% | -0.08% | 34.28% | -4.71% | 13.54% | -3.04% | -10.01% | 51.69% | -31.47% | 20.96% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -6.63% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 32.74% | 61.73% | 9.04% | 36.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMK and CTAS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.47 |
Fundamentals
ARMK:
$14.26B
CTAS:
$71.08B
ARMK:
$1.34
CTAS:
$4.75
ARMK:
40.00
CTAS:
36.75
ARMK:
1.10
CTAS:
2.58
ARMK:
0.74
CTAS:
6.46
ARMK:
4.35
CTAS:
14.84
ARMK:
$19.41B
CTAS:
$11.03B
ARMK:
$1.25B
CTAS:
$1.33B
ARMK:
$1.33B
CTAS:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMK vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank
ARMK
CTAS
ARMK vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARMK | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | -1.17 | +2.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | -1.58 | +3.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.82 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | -0.82 | +2.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | -1.43 | +4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMK | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | -1.17 | +2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.71 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.88 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.52 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
ARMK vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMK drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMK and CTAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMK | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -65.32% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.15% | -27.68% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.63% | -27.68% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -27.68% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.27% | -48.38% | -23.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -22.53% | +20.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.94% | -15.04% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 15.71% | -6.04% |
Volatility
ARMK vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Aramark (ARMK) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 6.16%. This indicates that ARMK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMK | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 6.16% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.89% | 14.56% | +5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.96% | 19.36% | +6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.03% | 22.43% | +6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 26.63% | +10.11% |
Dividends
ARMK vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than CTAS's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | 0.87% | 1.18% | 1.05% | 1.19% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 1.47% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.10% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
Financials
ARMK vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aramark and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARMK vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
ARMK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported a gross profit of 294.23M and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
ARMK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported an operating income of 219.75M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
ARMK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aramark reported a net income of 101.95M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMK and CTAS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMK has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to CTAS (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMK dropped -72.27% vs CTAS's -65.32%.
ARMK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARMK and CTAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer