ARMK vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Aramark (ARMK) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ARMK or CTAS.
Key characteristics
| ARMK | CTAS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 40.32% | 49.35% |
| 1Y Return | 51.07% | 64.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.98% | 28.04% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.75% | 29.67% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.84% | 30.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.62 | 3.65 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.19 | 5.78 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.72 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.00 | 12.52 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.35 | 37.36 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.52% | 1.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.85% | 18.72% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.26% | -65.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.46% | -0.93% |
Fundamentals
| ARMK | CTAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.19B | $90.63B |
| EPS | $1.81 | $3.97 |
| PE Ratio | 21.37 | 56.61 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.57 | 4.88 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $12.98B | $9.76B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $811.41M | $4.71B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $816.31M | $2.58B |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMK and CTAS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ARMK vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ARMK achieves a 40.32% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's 49.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ARMK has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 7.84%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 30.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ARMK vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ARMK vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than CTAS's 0.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | 0.97% | 1.19% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 1.47% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 0.00% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.48% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 2.17% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
ARMK vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMK drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMK and CTAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ARMK vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Aramark (ARMK) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 5.58%. This indicates that ARMK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ARMK vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aramark and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities