Correlation
The correlation between ARMK and CTAS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
ARMK vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Aramark (ARMK) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ARMK or CTAS.
Performance
ARMK vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ARMK:
1.03
CTAS:
1.47
ARMK:
1.58
CTAS:
1.88
ARMK:
1.20
CTAS:
1.30
ARMK:
1.04
CTAS:
1.85
ARMK:
2.90
CTAS:
4.70
ARMK:
9.86%
CTAS:
7.70%
ARMK:
29.77%
CTAS:
25.03%
ARMK:
-72.26%
CTAS:
-65.32%
ARMK:
-3.30%
CTAS:
0.00%
Fundamentals
ARMK:
$10.53B
CTAS:
$91.46B
ARMK:
$1.30
CTAS:
$4.35
ARMK:
30.90
CTAS:
52.07
ARMK:
1.57
CTAS:
4.01
ARMK:
0.60
CTAS:
9.02
ARMK:
3.49
CTAS:
19.76
ARMK:
$17.62B
CTAS:
$10.14B
ARMK:
$1.38B
CTAS:
$5.02B
ARMK:
$1.25B
CTAS:
$2.84B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMK achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's 24.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ARMK has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 7.22%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.90% annualized return.
ARMK
9.14%
21.47%
0.33%
30.41%
18.99%
18.16%
7.22%
CTAS
24.44%
7.20%
0.69%
36.41%
32.71%
30.88%
27.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ARMK vs. CTAS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ARMK
CTAS
ARMK vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ARMK vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than CTAS's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | 1.01% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.16% | 1.03% | 1.49% | 0.98% | 1.10% | 1.11% | 1.01% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.69% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 2.17% |
Drawdowns
ARMK vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMK drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMK and CTAS.
Loading data...
Volatility
ARMK vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Aramark (ARMK) has a higher volatility of 10.53% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 3.81%. This indicates that ARMK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
ARMK vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aramark and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARMK vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
ARMK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported a gross profit of 359.65M and revenue of 4.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.4%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
ARMK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported an operating income of 174.18M and revenue of 4.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 609.85M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
ARMK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aramark reported a net income of 61.85M and revenue of 4.28B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 463.50M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.