NOC vs. BWXT
Compare and contrast key facts about Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NOC or BWXT.
Correlation
The correlation between NOC and BWXT is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NOC vs. BWXT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NOC:
0.38
BWXT:
-0.32
NOC:
0.69
BWXT:
-0.21
NOC:
1.09
BWXT:
0.97
NOC:
0.39
BWXT:
-0.32
NOC:
0.94
BWXT:
-0.87
NOC:
8.55%
BWXT:
12.07%
NOC:
21.04%
BWXT:
33.13%
NOC:
-69.38%
BWXT:
-47.88%
NOC:
-9.95%
BWXT:
-32.87%
Fundamentals
NOC:
$70.28B
BWXT:
$8.16B
NOC:
$28.35
BWXT:
$3.07
NOC:
17.13
BWXT:
29.07
NOC:
3.03
BWXT:
2.31
NOC:
$30.90B
BWXT:
$2.10B
NOC:
$6.23B
BWXT:
$506.66M
NOC:
$4.63B
BWXT:
$343.11M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly higher than BWXT's -19.68% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has underperformed BWXT with an annualized return of 13.29%, while BWXT has yielded a comparatively higher 16.11% annualized return.
NOC
3.92%
-0.21%
-8.75%
8.66%
10.17%
13.29%
BWXT
-19.68%
-10.13%
-23.84%
-10.32%
13.76%
16.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NOC vs. BWXT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NOC
BWXT
NOC vs. BWXT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NOC vs. BWXT - Dividend Comparison
NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than BWXT's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% | 1.84% |
BWXT BWX Technologies, Inc. | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 1.26% | 1.10% | 1.67% | 0.69% | 0.91% | 0.83% | 1.32% |
Drawdowns
NOC vs. BWXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than BWXT's maximum drawdown of -47.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and BWXT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NOC vs. BWXT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 9.22%, while BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NOC vs. BWXT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and BWX Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
User Portfolios with NOC or BWXT
5%
YTD
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Portfolio by date created
Ryan M Dorsey
Transactional Portfolio Use
I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.
The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?
EG