PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ARMK vs. METC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ARMK and METC is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

ARMK vs. METC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aramark (ARMK) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
20.50%
-32.13%
ARMK
METC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ARMK:

1.57

METC:

-0.77

Sortino Ratio

ARMK:

2.24

METC:

-1.02

Omega Ratio

ARMK:

1.27

METC:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

ARMK:

2.69

METC:

-0.80

Martin Ratio

ARMK:

9.17

METC:

-1.30

Ulcer Index

ARMK:

4.06%

METC:

36.02%

Daily Std Dev

ARMK:

23.73%

METC:

60.60%

Max Drawdown

ARMK:

-72.27%

METC:

-85.53%

Current Drawdown

ARMK:

-7.01%

METC:

-55.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARMK:

$10.37B

METC:

$499.13M

EPS

ARMK:

$0.99

METC:

$0.67

PE Ratio

ARMK:

39.56

METC:

14.30

PEG Ratio

ARMK:

1.57

METC:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARMK:

$12.99B

METC:

$495.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARMK:

$845.75M

METC:

$81.96M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARMK:

$920.61M

METC:

$59.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMK achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -6.63% return.


ARMK

YTD

4.96%

1M

4.85%

6M

20.49%

1Y

38.14%

5Y*

4.48%

10Y*

6.80%

METC

YTD

-6.63%

1M

-12.03%

6M

-32.12%

1Y

-50.66%

5Y*

29.81%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARMK vs. METC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARMK is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARMK is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARMK is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARMK is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARMK is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARMK is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

METC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of METC is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of METC is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of METC is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of METC is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of METC is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of METC is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ARMK vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARMK, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.57-0.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARMK, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.24-1.02
The chart of Omega ratio for ARMK, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.270.88
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARMK, currently valued at 2.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.69-0.80
The chart of Martin ratio for ARMK, currently valued at 9.17, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.17-1.30
ARMK
METC

The current ARMK Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the METC Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMK and METC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.57
-0.77
ARMK
METC

Dividends

ARMK vs. METC - Dividend Comparison

ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than METC's 4.31% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ARMK
Aramark
1.00%1.05%1.19%1.06%1.19%1.14%1.01%1.47%0.97%1.09%1.09%1.00%
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
4.31%4.02%2.91%6.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ARMK vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMK drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum METC drawdown of -85.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMK and METC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.01%
-55.98%
ARMK
METC

Volatility

ARMK vs. METC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aramark (ARMK) is 6.47%, while Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that ARMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.47%
14.32%
ARMK
METC

Financials

ARMK vs. METC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aramark and Ramaco Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab