ARMK vs. GEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Aramark (ARMK) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ARMK or GEO.
Key characteristics
| ARMK | GEO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 40.40% | 134.16% |
| 1Y Return | 42.14% | 175.95% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.39% | 39.58% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.08% | 14.48% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.08% | 5.47% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 2.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.34 | 4.41 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.53 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.16 | 2.89 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.77 | 11.83 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.65% | 14.67% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.70% | 60.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.26% | -86.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.41% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| ARMK | GEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.30B | $3.54B |
| EPS | $1.81 | $0.26 |
| PE Ratio | 21.61 | 97.54 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.57 | 1.99 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $12.98B | $1.82B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $811.41M | $409.22M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $816.31M | $346.04M |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMK and GEO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ARMK vs. GEO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ARMK achieves a 40.40% return, which is significantly lower than GEO's 134.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ARMK has outperformed GEO with an annualized return of 8.08%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ARMK vs. GEO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ARMK vs. GEO - Dividend Comparison
ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while GEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | 0.97% | 1.19% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 1.47% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 0.00% |
GEO The GEO Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.23% | 20.09% | 11.56% | 9.54% | 7.95% | 7.24% | 8.68% | 5.77% | 6.36% |
Drawdowns
ARMK vs. GEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMK drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, smaller than the maximum GEO drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMK and GEO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ARMK vs. GEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aramark (ARMK) is 5.87%, while The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a volatility of 38.73%. This indicates that ARMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ARMK vs. GEO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aramark and The GEO Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities