ARMK vs. ECL
ARMK (Aramark) and ECL (Ecolab Inc.) are both stocks. ARMK operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while ECL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, ARMK returned 9.58%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for ECL. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ARMK vs. ECL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMK achieves a 55.39% return, which is significantly higher than ECL's 6.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ARMK having a 9.58% annualized return and ECL not far ahead at 9.68%.
ARMK
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 48.81%
- YTD
- 55.39%
- 1Y
- 35.60%
- 3Y*
- 26.60%
- 5Y*
- 18.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.67%
ECL
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- 6M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 7.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | $131.50M | $139.53M | $151.81M |
ECL Ecolab Inc. | $370.45M | $328.65M | $428.60M |
ARMK vs. ECL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | 55.39% | -0.08% | 34.28% | -4.71% | 13.54% | -3.04% | -10.01% | 51.69% | -31.47% | 20.96% |
ECL Ecolab Inc. | 6.33% | 13.19% | 19.29% | 37.94% | -37.10% | 9.38% | 13.17% | 32.26% | 11.07% | 15.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMK and ECL is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.41 |
Fundamentals
ARMK:
$14.98B
ECL:
$78.14B
ARMK:
$1.34
ECL:
$7.45
ARMK:
42.53
ECL:
37.26
ARMK:
1.17
ECL:
1.97
ARMK:
0.78
ECL:
4.68
ARMK:
4.63
ECL:
7.81
ARMK:
$19.41B
ECL:
$16.84B
ARMK:
$1.25B
ECL:
$3.71B
ARMK:
$1.33B
ECL:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMK vs. ECL — Risk / Return Rank
ARMK
ECL
ARMK vs. ECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Ecolab Inc. (ECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMK | ECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.07 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 0.36 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 0.76 | +3.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMK vs. ECL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMK drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, which is greater than ECL's maximum drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMK and ECL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMK | ECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -47.19% | -25.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -20.09% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.63% | -20.09% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -43.70% | +16.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.27% | -43.70% | -28.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -9.48% | +7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.79% | -7.99% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.02% | 9.54% | -1.52% |
Volatility
ARMK vs. ECL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aramark (ARMK) is 3.93%, while Ecolab Inc. (ECL) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that ARMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMK | ECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 7.54% | -3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.50% | 17.27% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.92% | 21.79% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.71% | 24.08% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.72% | 25.13% | +11.59% |
Dividends
ARMK vs. ECL - Dividend Comparison
ARMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than ECL's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMK Aramark | 0.82% | 1.18% | 1.05% | 1.19% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 1.47% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.10% |
ECL Ecolab Inc. | 1.02% | 1.02% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.42% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.96% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.17% |
Financials
ARMK vs. ECL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aramark and Ecolab Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARMK vs. ECL - Profitability Comparison
ARMK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aramark reported a gross profit of 294.23M and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.
ECL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.77B and revenue of 4.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -40.1%.
ARMK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aramark reported an operating income of 219.75M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
ECL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported an operating income of 757.90M and revenue of 4.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.
ARMK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aramark reported a net income of 101.95M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
ECL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a net income of 534.90M and revenue of 4.42B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMK and ECL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECL has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to ARMK (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMK dropped -72.27% vs ECL's -47.19%.
ARMK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARMK and ECL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer