NOC vs. RGR
Compare and contrast key facts about Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR).
Performance
NOC vs. RGR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NOC vs. RGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 22.63% | 23.61% | 1.93% | -12.79% | 43.02% | 29.29% | -9.92% | 42.69% | -18.95% | 33.88% |
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 25.50% | -6.13% | -20.91% | -8.04% | -15.41% | 9.30% | 50.28% | -10.14% | -2.84% | 8.65% |
Fundamentals
NOC:
$29.15
RGR:
-$0.72
NOC:
2.38
RGR:
1.13
NOC:
$41.95B
RGR:
$395.00M
NOC:
$6.02B
RGR:
$54.20M
NOC:
$6.43B
RGR:
-$1.84M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a 22.63% return, which is significantly lower than RGR's 25.50% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has outperformed RGR with an annualized return of 15.11%, while RGR has yielded a comparatively lower -1.62% annualized return.
NOC
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- 22.63%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 38.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 18.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
RGR
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 6M
- -6.78%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- -9.17%
- 5Y*
- -5.50%
- 10Y*
- -1.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOC vs. RGR — Risk / Return Rank
NOC
RGR
NOC vs. RGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOC | RGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.13 | +1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 0.41 | +1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.07 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 0.14 | +2.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | 0.30 | +4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOC | RGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.13 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | -0.18 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | -0.05 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.22 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between NOC and RGR is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NOC vs. RGR - Dividend Comparison
NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than RGR's 1.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% |
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 1.12% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 14.66% | 4.94% | 10.00% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
NOC vs. RGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, smaller than the maximum RGR drawdown of -79.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and RGR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOC | RGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -79.69% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.56% | -38.79% | +23.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.28% | -60.59% | +38.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.38% | -60.59% | +24.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.25% | -43.94% | +34.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -31.89% | +13.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.24% | 17.88% | -10.64% |
Volatility
NOC vs. RGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 6.83%, while Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) has a volatility of 10.94%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NOC | RGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 10.94% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 31.38% | -12.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.98% | 39.13% | -10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 30.37% | -5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 33.39% | -8.20% |
Financials
NOC vs. RGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities