NOC vs. LMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NOC or LMT.
Correlation
The correlation between NOC and LMT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NOC vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NOC:
0.25
LMT:
0.79
NOC:
0.47
LMT:
1.18
NOC:
1.06
LMT:
1.17
NOC:
0.21
LMT:
0.62
NOC:
0.71
LMT:
2.07
NOC:
6.24%
LMT:
6.47%
NOC:
17.87%
LMT:
16.98%
NOC:
-69.38%
LMT:
-70.23%
NOC:
-13.30%
LMT:
-19.94%
Fundamentals
NOC:
$69.98B
LMT:
$116.29B
NOC:
$16.23
LMT:
$27.63
NOC:
29.59
LMT:
17.76
NOC:
0.84
LMT:
4.02
NOC:
$40.99B
LMT:
$71.30B
NOC:
$6.92B
LMT:
$8.62B
NOC:
$4.57B
LMT:
$10.39B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 13.85%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.59% annualized return.
NOC
1.99%
-4.16%
9.56%
3.97%
8.07%
13.85%
LMT
10.72%
-7.97%
5.82%
12.01%
7.68%
12.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NOC vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NOC vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than LMT's 2.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.71% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 2.08% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.61% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% | 2.85% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
NOC vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NOC vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is 4.80%, while Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that NOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NOC vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities