PortfoliosLab logo
NOC vs. LMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NOC and LMT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NOC vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NOC:

0.09

LMT:

0.15

Sortino Ratio

NOC:

0.25

LMT:

0.31

Omega Ratio

NOC:

1.04

LMT:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

NOC:

0.07

LMT:

0.09

Martin Ratio

NOC:

0.17

LMT:

0.18

Ulcer Index

NOC:

8.74%

LMT:

16.13%

Daily Std Dev

NOC:

25.62%

LMT:

23.45%

Max Drawdown

NOC:

-69.38%

LMT:

-70.23%

Current Drawdown

NOC:

-12.44%

LMT:

-22.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOC:

$67.51B

LMT:

$109.73B

EPS

NOC:

$25.32

LMT:

$23.21

PE Ratio

NOC:

18.52

LMT:

20.18

PEG Ratio

NOC:

3.04

LMT:

1.69

PS Ratio

NOC:

1.67

LMT:

1.53

PB Ratio

NOC:

4.51

LMT:

16.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOC:

$40.37B

LMT:

$71.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOC:

$7.81B

LMT:

$7.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOC:

$5.70B

LMT:

$9.08B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's -2.91% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 13.39%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.25% annualized return.


NOC

YTD

1.28%

1M

-11.97%

6M

-3.38%

1Y

2.26%

5Y*

9.85%

10Y*

13.39%

LMT

YTD

-2.91%

1M

-1.84%

6M

-11.24%

1Y

3.39%

5Y*

8.28%

10Y*

12.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOC vs. LMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOC is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOC is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOC is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOC is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOC is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOC is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMT is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMT is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMT is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMT is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMT is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMT is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NOC vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOC and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NOC vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than LMT's 2.75% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.74%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%1.84%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.75%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%

Drawdowns

NOC vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NOC vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 6.85%. This indicates that NOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NOC vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20212022202320242025
9.47B
17.96B
(NOC) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOC vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
16.7%
12.9%
(NOC) Gross Margin
(LMT) Gross Margin
NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.58B and revenue of 9.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 17.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 573.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 17.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 481.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 17.96B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.