PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NOC vs. LMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


NOCLMT
YTD Return4.32%2.62%
1Y Return10.20%3.45%
3Y Return (Ann)12.93%9.64%
5Y Return (Ann)12.58%9.60%
10Y Return (Ann)16.90%14.01%
Sharpe Ratio0.320.07
Daily Std Dev21.27%17.18%
Max Drawdown-69.38%-70.23%
Current Drawdown-9.29%-5.32%

Fundamentals


NOCLMT
Market Cap$71.17B$110.68B
EPS$14.37$27.31
PE Ratio33.4316.89
PEG Ratio0.914.44
Revenue (TTM)$40.12B$69.64B
Gross Profit (TTM)$7.47B$8.39B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.14B$10.15B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between NOC and LMT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

NOC vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 16.90%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


16,000.00%18,000.00%20,000.00%22,000.00%24,000.00%26,000.00%28,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18,912.94%
28,301.92%
NOC
LMT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Northrop Grumman Corporation

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOC vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NOC, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NOC, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NOC, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NOC, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NOC, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.42
LMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LMT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.22

NOC vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of NOC and LMT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.40December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.32
0.07
NOC
LMT

Dividends

NOC vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than LMT's 2.66% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.54%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%1.84%2.08%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.66%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%3.22%

Drawdowns

NOC vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.29%
-5.32%
NOC
LMT

Volatility

NOC vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 3.88%. This indicates that NOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.38%
3.88%
NOC
LMT

Financials

NOC vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northrop Grumman Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items