NOC vs. VOO
NOC (Northrop Grumman Corporation) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, NOC returned 11.28%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VOO. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NOC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOC achieves a -4.14% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, NOC has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.28%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
NOC
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -21.04%
- YTD
- -4.14%
- 1Y
- -6.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.46%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $545.76M | $521.87M | $523.59M | |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
NOC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | -4.14% | 23.61% | 1.93% | -12.79% | 43.02% | 29.29% | -9.92% | 42.69% | -18.95% | 33.88% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOC and VOO is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.41 |
The correlation between NOC and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
NOC
VOO
NOC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.28 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 2.21 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 9.44 | -9.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOC drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOC and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -33.99% | -37.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.13% | -8.90% | -26.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.13% | -18.69% | -16.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.13% | -24.52% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.38% | -33.99% | -2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.06% | -1.38% | -27.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.44% | -3.67% | -14.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.55% | 2.08% | +14.47% |
Volatility
NOC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that NOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 3.54% | +5.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.69% | 10.10% | +10.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.15% | 12.82% | +13.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.67% | 16.93% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 18.01% | +7.64% |
Dividends
NOC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
NOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.73% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOC and VOO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOC has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOC dropped -71.12% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOC and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer