ARMH vs. AIS
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.
Performance
ARMH vs. AIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- -20.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIS
- 1D
- -5.97%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- 6M
- 76.19%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 1Y
- 156.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -3.02% |
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | -5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and AIS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIS
ARMH vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 26.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, roughly equal to the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and AIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -32.78% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -18.63% | -13.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -5.68% | -9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.58% | 44.66% | +60.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 42.54% | +63.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 42.54% | +63.04% |
ARMH vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARMH nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and AIS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.
ARMH and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.75% for AIS.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and AIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer