ARMH vs. AIS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while AIS is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

ARMH vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ARMH

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -23.97%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AIS

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -14.16%
• 6M: 49.61%
• YTD: 68.71%
• 1Y: 119.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 75.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	$37.93M	$45.10M	$51.04M
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	$194.56K	$502.72K	$705.34K

ARMH vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	-22.59%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	-15.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and AIS is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.71

Return for Risk

ARMH vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 87
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARMH vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARMH	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.42	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.91	—

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -48.81%, which is greater than AIS's maximum drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMH	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.81%	-34.44%	-14.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.80%	-27.93%	-17.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.00%	-6.30%	-16.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMH	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	99.09%	47.78%	+51.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	99.09%	44.01%	+55.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.09%	44.01%	+55.08%

ARMH vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMH vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARMH nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMH and AIS in my portfolio?

ARMH and AIS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARMH or AIS?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMH or AIS?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMH or AIS?

ARMH and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ARMH and AIS?

ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIS is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.75% for AIS.