ARMH vs. VGT
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
ARMH vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -7.59%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 28.03%
- 6M
- 26.85%
- 1Y
- 54.06%
- 3Y*
- 31.77%
- 5Y*
- 20.58%
- 10Y*
- 25.96%
ARMH vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 31.98% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and VGT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGT
ARMH vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -54.63% | +29.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.59% | -4.18% | -3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -7.95% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.34% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.89% | 22.44% | +95.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.89% | 25.50% | +92.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.89% | 24.78% | +93.11% |
ARMH vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ARMH vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and VGT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ARMH.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer