AESR vs. SPYG
AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AESR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. AESR is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AESR returned 15.88%/yr vs 15.37%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
AESR vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 22.52% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 12.18% return.
AESR
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 21.75%
- 1Y
- 39.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- 1Y
- 32.56%
- 3Y*
- 26.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.17%
AESR vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 22.52% | 20.34% | 25.37% | 21.03% | -17.52% | 25.26% | 19.58% | 0.76% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 12.18% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AESR and SPYG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between AESR and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
AESR vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AESR
SPYG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AESR
SPYG
Communication Services
AESR
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
AESR
SPYG
Industrials
AESR
SPYG
Financial Services
AESR
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
AESR
SPYG
Healthcare
AESR
SPYG
Energy
AESR
SPYG
Basic Materials
AESR
SPYG
Utilities
AESR
SPYG
Real Estate
AESR
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AESR vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
AESR
SPYG
AESR vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AESR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 2.32 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.54 | 9.26 | +7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AESR vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AESR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | -67.63% | +36.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -13.76% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | -22.14% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -32.67% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -2.50% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -24.29% | +18.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 3.43% | -1.02% |
Volatility
AESR vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.92%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AESR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 6.92% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 13.84% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 17.07% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 21.33% | -3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 20.73% | -0.13% |
AESR vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
AESR vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.79%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 18.79% | 23.02% | 0.17% | 0.33% | 0.73% | 6.59% | 1.06% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AESR and SPYG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AESR has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to SPYG (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, AESR leads with 15.88% vs 15.37% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AESR has performed better with a 15.88% return vs 15.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.
AESR has the higher dividend yield at 18.79%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
AESR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.04% for SPYG.
AESR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AESR and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer