AESR vs. BSJO
AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AESR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while BSJO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index. AESR is actively managed, while BSJO is passively managed. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJO.
Performance
AESR vs. BSJO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AESR
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 17.74%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 23.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AESR vs. BSJO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 17.20% |
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AESR vs. BSJO — Risk / Return Rank
AESR
BSJO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AESR vs. BSJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AESR | BSJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AESR vs. BSJO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AESR | BSJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | — | — |
Volatility
AESR vs. BSJO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AESR | BSJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.81% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.65% | — | — |
AESR vs. BSJO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJO's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
AESR vs. BSJO - Dividend Comparison
AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.55%, while BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 19.55% | 23.02% | 0.17% | 0.33% | 0.73% | 6.59% | 1.06% | 0.33% |
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.
AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.55%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.
AESR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BSJO is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.42% for BSJO.
Find the right allocation for AESR and BSJO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer