AESR vs. BSJO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AESR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while BSJO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index. AESR is actively managed, while BSJO is passively managed. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJO.

Performance

AESR vs. BSJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AESR

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 7.32%
• YTD: 21.04%
• 6M: 22.36%
• 1Y: 39.98%
• 3Y*: 26.85%
• 5Y*: 15.50%
• 10Y*: —

BSJO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AESR vs. BSJO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF	16.92%
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

AESR vs. BSJO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AESR

AESR Risk / Return Rank: 75
AESR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
AESR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AESR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
AESR Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AESR Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AESR vs. BSJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AESR	BSJO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.11	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.33	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AESR	BSJO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	—	—

Drawdowns

AESR vs. BSJO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, which is greater than BSJO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and BSJO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AESR	BSJO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.06%	0.00%	-31.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.02%	0.00%	-6.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AESR	BSJO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.39%	0.00%	+16.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.83%	0.00%	+17.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	0.00%	+20.45%

AESR vs. BSJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJO's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

AESR vs. BSJO - Dividend Comparison

AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.02%, while BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF	19.02%	23.02%	0.17%	0.33%	0.73%	6.59%	1.06%	0.33%
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AESR or BSJO?

On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AESR or BSJO?

BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AESR or BSJO?

AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.02%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.

What is the main difference between AESR and BSJO?

AESR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BSJO is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.42% for BSJO.