AESR vs. GARP
AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AESR is actively managed, while GARP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AESR returned 15.50%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for GARP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
AESR vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 22.17% return.
AESR
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 7.32%
- YTD
- 21.04%
- 6M
- 22.36%
- 1Y
- 39.98%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
AESR vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 21.04% | 20.34% | 25.37% | 21.03% | -17.52% | 25.26% | 16.67% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 22.17% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AESR and GARP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between AESR and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
AESR vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AESR
GARP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AESR
GARP
Communication Services
AESR
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
AESR
GARP
Industrials
AESR
GARP
Financial Services
AESR
GARP
Basic Materials
AESR
GARP
Consumer Defensive
AESR
GARP
-
Energy
AESR
GARP
Healthcare
AESR
GARP
Utilities
AESR
GARP
Real Estate
AESR
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AESR vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
AESR
GARP
AESR vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AESR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 2.59 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.25 | 3.33 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 3.41 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.33 | 13.74 | +3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AESR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.59 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.95 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.90 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
AESR vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, roughly equal to the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AESR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | -31.34% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -13.69% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | -23.73% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -30.61% | +5.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -7.37% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 3.40% | -1.07% |
Volatility
AESR vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) at 4.87%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AESR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 4.87% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.76% | 13.88% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 17.87% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 21.97% | -4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 23.90% | -3.45% |
AESR vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
AESR vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.02%, more than GARP's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 19.02% | 23.02% | 0.17% | 0.33% | 0.73% | 6.59% | 1.06% | 0.33% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AESR and GARP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AESR has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to GARP (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.74% vs 15.50% for AESR. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 15.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.
AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.02%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AESR and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer