PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AESR vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AESR vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 22.17% return.


AESR

1D
1.33%
1M
7.32%
YTD
21.04%
6M
22.36%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
26.85%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*

GARP

1D
-0.01%
1M
12.94%
YTD
22.17%
6M
23.18%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
33.92%
5Y*
20.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AESR vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
21.04%20.34%25.37%21.03%-17.52%25.26%16.67%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
22.17%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AESR and GARP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020

0.88

The correlation between AESR and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

AESR vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AESR
GARP

Technology

33.8%
56.7%

Communication Services

26.0%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
6.1%

Industrials

10.6%
6.9%

Financial Services

7.0%
7.5%

Basic Materials

2.7%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%

-

Energy

2.1%
2.7%

Healthcare

2.0%
5.4%

Utilities

0.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.3%
0.4%

Technology

AESR
33.8%
GARP
56.7%

Communication Services

AESR
26.0%
GARP
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AESR
12.8%
GARP
6.1%

Industrials

AESR
10.6%
GARP
6.9%

Financial Services

AESR
7.0%
GARP
7.5%

Basic Materials

AESR
2.7%
GARP
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

AESR
2.4%
GARP

-

Energy

AESR
2.1%
GARP
2.7%

Healthcare

AESR
2.0%
GARP
5.4%

Utilities

AESR
0.3%
GARP
1.4%

Real Estate

AESR
0.3%
GARP
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AESR vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AESR
AESR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AESR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AESR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AESR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AESR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AESR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AESR vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AESRGARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

2.59

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

3.33

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

3.41

+0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.33

13.74

+3.59

AESR vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AESR Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the GARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AESR and GARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AESRGARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.95

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.90

-0.07

Drawdowns

AESR vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, roughly equal to the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and GARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AESRGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.06%

-31.34%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-13.69%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-23.73%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-30.61%

+5.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.01%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-7.37%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

3.40%

-1.07%

Volatility

AESR vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison

Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) at 4.87%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AESRGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

4.87%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

13.88%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

17.87%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

21.97%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.45%

23.90%

-3.45%

AESR vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

AESR vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.02%, more than GARP's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
19.02%23.02%0.17%0.33%0.73%6.59%1.06%0.33%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AESR and GARP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AESR has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to GARP (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs GARP's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.74% vs 15.50% for AESR. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 15.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.

AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.02%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.15% for GARP.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AESR and GARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer