PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AESR vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AESR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


AESR

1D
-0.05%
1M
7.94%
YTD
20.98%
6M
21.17%
1Y
39.18%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AESR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
20.98%20.34%25.37%21.03%-17.52%25.26%19.58%0.76%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between AESR and VOO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.94

The correlation between AESR and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

AESR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AESR
VOO

Technology

33.8%
35.7%

Communication Services

26.0%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
10.2%

Industrials

10.6%
8.3%

Financial Services

7.0%
11.6%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.9%

Energy

2.1%
3.5%

Healthcare

2.0%
8.5%

Utilities

0.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.9%

Technology

AESR
33.8%
VOO
35.7%

Communication Services

AESR
26.0%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AESR
12.8%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

AESR
10.6%
VOO
8.3%

Financial Services

AESR
7.0%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

AESR
2.7%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

AESR
2.4%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

AESR
2.1%
VOO
3.5%

Healthcare

AESR
2.0%
VOO
8.5%

Utilities

AESR
0.3%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

AESR
0.3%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AESR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AESR
AESR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AESR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AESR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AESR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AESR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AESR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AESR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AESRVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.39

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

3.25

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

3.16

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.87

14.73

+2.15

AESR vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AESR Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AESR and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AESRVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.39

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.89

-0.05

Drawdowns

AESR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AESRVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.06%

-33.99%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-8.90%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-18.69%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-24.52%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.70%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-3.69%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.91%

+0.42%

Volatility

AESR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AESRVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

2.84%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

8.90%

+3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

11.80%

+4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

16.81%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

18.01%

+2.43%

AESR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AESR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.03%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
19.03%23.02%0.17%0.33%0.73%6.59%1.06%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, AESR and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AESR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, AESR leads with 15.28% vs 13.90% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AESR has performed better with a 15.28% return vs 13.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.

AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.03%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

AESR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.03% for VOO.

AESR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AESR and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer