AESR vs. VOO
AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AESR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. AESR is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AESR returned 15.28%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
AESR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.
AESR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 21.17%
- 1Y
- 39.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.28%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
AESR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 20.98% | 20.34% | 25.37% | 21.03% | -17.52% | 25.26% | 19.58% | 0.76% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AESR and VOO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between AESR and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
AESR vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AESR
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AESR
VOO
Communication Services
AESR
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
AESR
VOO
Industrials
AESR
VOO
Financial Services
AESR
VOO
Basic Materials
AESR
VOO
Consumer Defensive
AESR
VOO
Energy
AESR
VOO
Healthcare
AESR
VOO
Utilities
AESR
VOO
Real Estate
AESR
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AESR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
AESR
VOO
AESR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AESR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.39 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | 3.25 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 3.16 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 14.73 | +2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AESR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.39 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.83 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.89 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
AESR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AESR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | -33.99% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -8.90% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | -18.69% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -24.52% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.70% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -3.69% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.91% | +0.42% |
Volatility
AESR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AESR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 2.84% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 8.90% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 11.80% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 16.81% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 18.01% | +2.43% |
AESR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AESR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.03%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 19.03% | 23.02% | 0.17% | 0.33% | 0.73% | 6.59% | 1.06% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, AESR and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AESR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, AESR leads with 15.28% vs 13.90% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AESR has performed better with a 15.28% return vs 13.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.
AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.03%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
AESR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.03% for VOO.
AESR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AESR and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer