PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AESR vs. XLSR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AESR and XLSR is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

AESR vs. XLSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.69%
6.52%
AESR
XLSR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AESR:

1.98

XLSR:

1.44

Sortino Ratio

AESR:

2.71

XLSR:

1.95

Omega Ratio

AESR:

1.35

XLSR:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

AESR:

3.00

XLSR:

1.91

Martin Ratio

AESR:

11.77

XLSR:

8.05

Ulcer Index

AESR:

2.49%

XLSR:

2.44%

Daily Std Dev

AESR:

14.81%

XLSR:

13.67%

Max Drawdown

AESR:

-31.06%

XLSR:

-32.94%

Current Drawdown

AESR:

-1.67%

XLSR:

-2.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 28.83% return, which is significantly higher than XLSR's 19.12% return.


AESR

YTD

28.83%

1M

0.75%

6M

8.69%

1Y

29.30%

5Y*

13.46%

10Y*

N/A

XLSR

YTD

19.12%

1M

-0.33%

6M

7.06%

1Y

19.48%

5Y*

12.26%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AESR vs. XLSR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than XLSR's 0.70% expense ratio.


AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
Expense ratio chart for AESR: current value at 1.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.46%
Expense ratio chart for XLSR: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AESR vs. XLSR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AESR, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.981.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for AESR, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.711.94
The chart of Omega ratio for AESR, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.351.27
The chart of Calmar ratio for AESR, currently valued at 3.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.001.90
The chart of Martin ratio for AESR, currently valued at 11.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.777.98
AESR
XLSR

The current AESR Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the XLSR Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AESR and XLSR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.98
1.43
AESR
XLSR

Dividends

AESR vs. XLSR - Dividend Comparison

AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than XLSR's 0.52% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
0.17%0.33%0.73%6.59%1.06%0.33%
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
0.52%1.04%1.79%6.06%1.25%0.94%

Drawdowns

AESR vs. XLSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum XLSR drawdown of -32.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and XLSR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.67%
-2.54%
AESR
XLSR

Volatility

AESR vs. XLSR - Volatility Comparison

Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) at 4.23%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.52%
4.23%
AESR
XLSR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab