ACWX vs. IWF

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWX returned 9.87%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for IWF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWF.

Performance

ACWX vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 9.87%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.

ACWX

• 1D: 3.41%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 13.42%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: 28.83%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

IWF

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 19.30%
• 3Y*: 22.57%
• 5Y*: 13.90%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWX vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	13.42%	32.59%	5.17%	15.63%	-16.07%	7.67%	10.29%	21.05%	-13.99%	27.20%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	2.83%	18.33%	33.12%	42.59%	-29.31%	27.43%	38.25%	35.86%	-1.67%	29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and IWF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008	0.77

The correlation between ACWX and IWF shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACWX vs. IWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACWX	IWF
Financial Services	23.3%	4.9%
Technology	22.4%	53.2%
Industrials	14.0%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	12.7%
Healthcare	6.7%	7.0%
Basic Materials	6.7%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	2.5%
Energy	4.8%	0.4%
Communication Services	4.7%	12.3%
Utilities	2.8%	1.1%
Real Estate	1.2%	0.4%

Return for Risk

ACWX vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWX

ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 64
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 36
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWX vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWX	IWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.21	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.70	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.22	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	1.19	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.69	3.93	+5.76

ACWX vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and IWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and IWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWX	IWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.40%	-64.25%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-16.27%	+4.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.84%	-23.36%	+9.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.07%	-32.72%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.38%	-32.72%	-2.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-5.59%	+3.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.32%	-22.06%	+8.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	4.92%	-1.94%

Volatility

ACWX vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) at 5.43%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWX	IWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.03%	5.43%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.36%	12.40%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.43%	15.96%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	21.47%	-5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	21.01%	-3.58%

ACWX vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IWF's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWX vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than IWF's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	2.49%	2.82%	2.97%	2.96%	2.68%	2.74%	1.88%	3.22%	2.60%	2.40%	2.77%	2.51%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.35%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWX and IWF in my portfolio?

ACWX and IWF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACWX or IWF?

ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to IWF (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs IWF's -64.25%.

Which ETF is better, ACWX or IWF?

On 10-year performance, IWF leads with 18.15% vs 9.87% for ACWX. On fees, IWF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWF has been the lower-risk option at 5.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACWX or IWF?

Over the 10-year period, IWF has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWX or IWF?

IWF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACWX or IWF?

ACWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.35% for IWF.

What is the main difference between ACWX and IWF?

ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWF is Large Cap Growth Equities. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.18% for IWF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.